| ￭ | 1. Books | Mонографии |
| ￭ | 2. Articles in collective volumes (incl. collections of conference abstracts) and .....journals |
Статьи в сборниках (включая сборники тезисов) и журналах |
| ￭ | 3. Articles in encyclopedias | Энциклопедические статьи |
| ￭ | 4. Book reviews, communications | Рецензии, сообщения |
| ￭ | 5. Referative digests | Рефераты |
| ￭ | 6. Edited books and series | Издательская работа |
| ￭ | 7. Teaching programs | Учебные программы |
| ￭ | ....Abbreviatons | Cокращения |
| Explication to annotations in the second column: | ||
| ￭ | “Amendments to Reconstruction” | Revision or reinterpretation of a “Reconstructive Description” (see there) from previous research. |
| ￭ | “Conclusion” | Statement stemming from the observations made in the paper. |
| ￭ | “Data Collection” | Materials presented in form of dictionaries, vocabularies, indices, text collectionss, lists, etc. |
| ￭ | “Description” | Systematic treatment of a language or its fragment, a topic, or a phenomenon. |
| ￭ | “Etymology” | New etymological treatments, loanword studies. |
| ￭ | “Hypothesis/Hypotheses” | Theory / explanation developed in order to account for the observations made in the paper. |
| ￭ | “Interpretation” | Attempt at an interpretation of old texts and other data from unknown or insufficiently known languages. |
| ￭ | “New Descriptive Treatment” | A “Description” (see above) dealing with previously non-described or only partly described subject, or containing important innovations in approaches to description. |
| ￭ | “Phonetic Law(s)” | Formulation(s) of rule(s) of historical phonetic developments and of morphophonology (generative phonology). |
| ￭ | “Polemics” | Critical discussion of other scholar’s results and approaches, discussion of controversial issues. |
| ￭ | “Popular-science paper” | Presentation of a topic in a simplified manner for the audience of non-specialasts. |
| ￭ | “Reconstructive Description” | Attempt at a “Description” (see above) of non-attested facts based on comparative and historical procedures. |
| ￭ | “Review Article” | State-of-the-art report, annotated bibliographical guide. |
| ￭ | “Unknown Early Sources” | Edited data fom archive sources (in original form or as a critical edition). |
| ￭ | Underlined are the results or aspects which may be viewed, in the author’s opinion, as innovative research contributions. | |
| ￭ | Results and aspects which play in the paper only a marginal role are not mentioned. | |
| 1. Mонографии | |
| 1.1. Опыт фонологического описания на основе анализа полевых данных (фонологическая система тазовского диалекта селькупского языка) [Дипломная работа, рукопись]. Москва, 1972, 60 стр. |
Final and most detailed presentation of the topic see in 1.4. |
| 1.2. Древнейшие угорско-самодийские языковые связи (Анализ некоторых аспектов генетических и ареальных взаимоотношений между уральскими языками) [Кандидатская дисс., рукопись]. Москва, 1978, 311 стр. REV.: (1) Т.Р. Вийтсо. - In: СФУ XVI, 1980, № 3, 237-240; (2) А. Künnap. - In: Fenno-Ugristica 7, Tartu, 1980, 116-126; (3) P. Alvre, Kandidaadiväitekiri ugri-samojeedi keelesooseist. - In: Keel ja Kirjandus XXIII. Tallinn, 1980, № 4, 254. |
See 1.5 (book version of the dissertation, with several sections added or omitted). |
| 1.3. Древнейшие угорско-самодийские языковые связи (Анализ некоторых аспектов генетических и ареальных взаимоотношений между уральскими языками Автореферат канд. дисс. Тарту, 1979, 20 стр. |
Abridged text (resp. long summary) of 1.2. |
| 1.4. Очерки по селькупскому языку: Тазовский диалект. Ч. 1. Москва, 1980. 412 стр. Авторы: А. И. Кузнецова, Е. А. Хелимский, Е. В. Грушкина. Мое преимущественное участие: разделы 2, 3.1-3.2, 3.5-3.6, 3.7.4. REV.: (1) А. Кünnap. - In: СФУ XVII, 1981, № 1, 73-78; (2) J. Janhunen. - In: FUF XLIV, 1982, 190-191. |
Description: Phonology, morphology. New Descriptive Treatment: Freedom and limits of allophonic variation. New Descriptive Treatment: The principle of two stems in Selkup nominal inflection. New Descriptive Treatment: The category of representation (Approach followed in the dissertation by Arkadij Gashilov, Leningrad 1988). New Descriptive Treatment: Principles of differentiation between case endings and postpositions. New Descriptive Treatment: Presence of the collective form, absence of the category of animateness. New Descriptive Treatment: The category of aspect (as distinct from Aktonsart) and its cryptotypic properties. |
1.5. Древнейшие венгерско-самодийские языковые параллели (Лингвистическая и этногенетическая интерпретация). Москва, 1982, 164 стр. REV.: (1) Р. Агеева. - In: РЖОН-С-Я, 1983, № 2, 39-43; (2) J. Lehtiranta, Ein kühnes Forschungsunternehmen. - In: FUF XLV, 1983, 273-279; (3) Gy. Décsy. - In: Ural-Altaische Jahrbücher 56, 1984, 165; (4) J. Pusztay, Az ősi magyar-szamojéd egyezésekről. - In: Magyar Nyelv, Budapest, 1986, LXXXII. évf., 2. sz., 236-242. |
New Descriptive Treatment: The areal-genetic (AG) type of language relationship and its presentation in genealogical trees - the scheme of a «stretched and torn apart gum». Description: AG relationships within the Uralic language family. Description: The classification of the Samoyed languages and the process of their divergation in the light of newer conclusions (cf. 2.5, 2.13). Data Collection, Conclusion: The lexicostatistics of the Samoyed languages; dating the age of their individual branches (which arose after the disintegration of the Proto-Samoyed comminity) with ca. 2,000 years. Polemics: Refutal of some hypotheses about “special relationship” between Samoyed and some of the Fino-Permic languages (D. Bubrih, J. Gulya). Conclusion: Samoyed and Ugric languages are historically linked by AG relationship within the Eastern Uralic area. Conclusion: The distinctions between verbal conjugations (subjective, objective, possibly also reflexive) must have existed already in Proto-Uralic, at least in its Eastern area. Reconstructive Description: Endings (in Sg) and functions of the three verbal conjugations in (Eastern) Uralic. Conclusion: The suppletive accusative forms of personal pronomina with the stem *ki are a feature of the Eastern Uralic area. Conclusion: The secondary local case markers with the co-affix *n are a feature of the Eastern Uralic area. Conclusion: The marking of causative verbs with a sequence of two markers of factitive verbs is a feature of the Eastern Uralic area. Conclusion: The co-existence of two forms of the numeral ‘2’, an attributive and a non-attributive (marked for dual), is a feature of the Eastern Uralic area. Conclusion: The development of non-palatal sibilants to dental fricative *θ (later partly to *t) is a feature of the Eastern Uralic area. Etymology (Hungarian, Samoyed, Uralic, Nostratic). |
1.6. The Language of the First Selkup Books. Szeged, 1983, 268 p. (Studia Uralo-Altaica 22). REV.: (1) A. Künnap. - In: СФУ XX, 1984, № 3, 224-225; (2) B. Comrie. - In: Language 61, 1985, No. 3, 722; (3) T. Janurik. - In: NyK 87, 1985, 1. sz., 261-262; (4) J. Janhunen. - In: FUF XLVIII, 1988, H. 2-3, 318. |
Data Collection: The lexical stock of Southern Selkup (the dialect of Ob/Lower Chaya) in N. P. Grigorovskis publications (1870s) with parallels frem other Selkup dialects and comments. Description: The grammar of Southern Selkup and its interpretation by Grigorovski. See also 1.19. |
1.7. Историческая и описательная диалектология самодийских языков REV.: Т.-Р. Вийтсо. - In: СФУ XXV, 1989, № 2, 151-153. |
Review article (review of the author’s own publications). |
Авторы: А. И. Кузнецова, О. А. Казакевич, Л. Ю. Иоффе, Е. А. Хелимский. Мое преимущественное участие: Стр. 6-88. REV.: А. Кünnap. - In: LU XXX, 1994, 154-155. |
Data Collection: Selkup folklore texts (28, incl. 15 taken down by me) with word-for-word translations and comments. Data Collection: Vocabulary index to 1.4 and to the texts in 1.8. |
1.9. A szamojéd népek vázlatos története Электронная публикация: link |
The Hungarian translation of 2.153. Cf. 2.180, 2.210. |
1.10.Die Matorische Sprache: Wörterbuch - Grundzüge der Grammatik - Sprachgeschichte REV.: (1) J. Alatalo, Ein Grundpfeiler der Samojedologie - In: FUF 55, 1999; (2) A. Künnap. - In: LU 35, 1999. |
Data Collection: The sources on Mators and their language. Description, partly Reconstructive Description: Phonology, Flexion, Derivation. Phonetic Laws: Vowel assimilation (palatalisation and labialisation), h-extension (after a word-inal labialized vowel), glottal stop, possible traces of consonant gradation. Amendments to Reconstruction (Proto-Samoyed), mostly concerning vowels. New Descriptive Treatment: Converbs (Zero-suffixed forms of verbs). Data Collection: Mator Dictionary based on all available sources (when possible, with entries given in phonological notation) with comments and etymologies (etymological references). Data Collection: Presumably Mator toponyms of the former Mator language area. |
| 1.11. Samojedit ja šamanismi: Viisi luentoa samojedeista, šamanismista ja uralilaisesta kulttuurista / Käänn. ja toim. Larisa Leisiö ja Timo Leisiö. Tampere, 1998, 85 s. (Tamperen yliopiston Kansanperinteen laitos. Julkaisusarja n:o 26). | Lectures (in Finnish translation) essentially based on 2.105 and 2.153, 2.32 and 2.214, 2.80, 2.85, 2.126, with supplements and comments of the editors’ or from the minutes of the lecture couurse. |
1.12. Компаративистика, уралистика: Статьи и лекции REV.: A. Künnap. - In: LU 36, 2000, 306-309. |
The collection includes partly revised (or translated into Russian) versions of a number of papers originally published in 1881-2000, as well as several new papers (2.172 - 2.174).See references to individual papers of this collection. |
1.13. Nordselkupisches Wörterbuch von F. G. Mal’cev (1903) REV.: (1) A. Künnap. - In: LU 38, 2002, 239-240; (2) G. Klumpp. - In: UAJb. 18, 2004, 251-255; (3) T. Salminen, An old Selkup wordlist made into a modern Selkup dictionary. - In: FUF 59, 2006, 186-190. |
Unknown Early Sources, Data Collection: The lexical stock of Northern Selkup (the dialect of the Turukhansk region) in F. G. Mal’cevs handwriten vocabulary (1903) with parallels from Tas Selkup. Description: Selkup (as reflected by Mal’cev) in comprison with other Northern Selkup dialects. |
1.14. Очерки по селькупскому языку: Тазовский диалект. Том 3: Русскоселькупский словарь. Разнопрофильные селькупские словари. Москва, 2002, 220 стр., илл. Авторы: О. А. Казакевич, А. И. Кузнецова, Е. А. Хелимский. Мое участие: фонетическая выверка написаний в русско-селькупском словаре и словаре топонимов. REV.: А. Кünnap. - In: LU XL, 2004, 69-71 |
Data Collection: Rusain-Selkup vocabuary, Selkup vocablaries - of word frequencies, of word frequencies alphabetical, reverse, of descriptive stems, of toponyms. |
1.16. Gerhard Friedrich Mueller: Nachrichten über Völker Sibiriens (1736-1742) REV.: G. Klumpp. - In: UAJb. 18, 2004, 251-255. |
Unknown Early Sources: G. F. Muellers ethnographic diary with vast ethnographic information and numerous data from Siberian languages, supplied with word indices, etc. |
1.17. Селькупский язык. Учебное пособие для педагогических колледжей и высших учебных заведений / Под ред. А. И. Кузнецовой. СанктПетербург: Просвещение, 2002. 396 стр. Авторы: А. И. Кузнецова, О. А. Казакевич, Е. В. Грушкина, Е. А. Хелимский. REV.: А. Кünnap. - In: LU XL, 2004, 69-71. |
Description. Учебное пособие, в основном повторяющее (с более или менее значительными переработкой и дополнениями) работу 1.4. |
1.18. Тунгусоманьчжурский языковой компонент в Аварском каганате и славянская этимология: Материалы к докладу на XIII Международном съезде славистов (The booklet includes the reprints of 2.170 and 2.175 as its second and third parts.). |
Etymology: Further etymoloical evidence in favour of the Hypothesis of Manchu-Tungus origin of European Avars (Avar glossae and proper names, Avar loanwords in Slavic, Manchu-Tungus origin of the word хоругвь). |
| 1.19. Южноселькупский словарь Н. П. Григоровского / Обработка и издание Е. А. Хелимского. Hamburg, 2007, 225 стр. (HSFM = Hamburger Finnisch-ugrische und Sibirische Materialien = Habent Sua Fata Manuscripta, Bd. 4). |
Unknown Early Sources, Data Collection: The lexical stock of Southern Selkup (the dialect of Ob/Lower Chaya) in N. P. Grigorovskis handwritten vocabulary and his publications (1870s) with parallels from other Selkup dialects and comments. See also 1.6. |
(1.20.) О материалах А. И. Кузьминой по селькупскому языку. Авторы: Н. А. Тучкова, Е. А. Хелимский IN PREPARATION |
|
1.21. Самодийско-тунгусские лексические параллели. Авторы: А. Е. Аникин, Е. А. Хелимский Москва 2007 |
|
(1.22.) Северноселькупский словарь. IN PREPARATION |
To be continued, if necessary, by V. Gusev (/ J. Alatalo). |
(1.23.) Marginalia ad SkWb. IN PREPARATION |
To be continued, if necessary, by V. Gusev (/ J. Alatalo) |
(1.24.) Marginalia ad UEW. IN PREPARATION |
|
| 2. Статьи в сборниках (включая сборники тезисов) и журналах | |
| 2.1. К фонологической характеристике селькупского языка. - In: 5 межвузовская студенческая конференция по структурной и прикладной лингвистике: Программа и тезисы // МГУ, Филологический факультет. Москва, 1971, 61-63. |
Detailed presentation of the topic see in 1.4. |
| 2.2. Селькупские дополнения к ностратическим этимологиям - In: Конференция по сравнительно-исторической грамматике индоевропейских языков: Предварительные материалы // Институт славяноведения и балканистики АН СССР. Москва, 1972, 85-86. |
Etymology (Selkup). |
| 2.3. Брод через реку времени. - In: Знание - сила. Москва, 1973, № 10, 35-37. |
Popular-science paper: The Nostratic theory. |
| 2.4. Влияние русского языка на употребительность внешне-местных падежей коми-зырянского языка. - In: Теоретические и экспериментальные исследования в области структурной и прикладной лингвистики. Москва, 1973, 213-217. |
Conclusion: A trend to replace external local case endings with postpositions in Izhma Komi can be attributed to Russian influence. |
2.5. К проблеме классификации самодийских языков |
Detailed presentation of the topic see in 1.5 (section 1.2). Conclusion: The Southern Samoyed languages do not form a genetic unit (and never did). The Samoyed language group consists of four subgroups: Northern Samoyed, Selkup, Kamas, Mator. |
2.6. О неабсолютном характере одной универсалии. |
Conclusion: In Selkup relative adjectives inflectional person marking affixes are placed closer to the stem than derivational suffixes, which contradicts to one of Greenberg’s universals (NB: starting with 1.8, Selkup relative adjectives are treated as forms of adjectival representation belonging to nominal inflection). |
2.7. Типы фонетических колебаний и процедура полевого исследования |
Conclusion: Phonetic variation (showing itself as inconsistent transcriptions in primary field records) may (a) be due to objective (target language) and subjective (researcher) reasons, (b) remain an allophonic phenomenon or affect the system of phonemes. Conclusion: When working with primary field records, one of the main tasks may be viewed as bringing irreliable elements together to a reliable construction. |
2.8. От лета 974-го. |
Popular-science paper: The glottochronological method. |
2.9. Детективная лингвистика. |
Popular-science paper: Languages in contact and change. |
2.10. Соответствия уральских a-основ и e-основ в тазовском диалекте селькупского языка. |
A short version of 2.12. |
| 2.11. К типологической характеристике тональных систем некоторых языков уральской семьи. - In: Типология как раздел языкознания: Тезисы дискуссии // Институт востоковедения АН СССР. Москва, 1976, 165-168. |
A detailed presentation of the topic see in 2.19. |
2.12. О соответствиях уральских a- и e-основ в тазовском диалекте селькупского языка |
Phonetic Laws: A system of phonetic rules regulating the correspondences between Proyo-Uralic and Selkup stem types and final vowels. This system remains essentially valid also in the framework of the Proto-Samoyed reconstruction by J. Janhunen (though can be optimized by dividing the processes into at least 2 stages - from Proto-Uralic to Proto-Samoyed and only then to Selkup). Etymology (Selkup, Uralic). |
2.13. Об одном переходном северносамодийском диалекте (К исторической диалектологии ненецкого языка) |
Unknown Early Sources (Yurak Nenets). Conclusion: A third main dialect of Nenets (on a line with Tundra and Forest dialects) - Old Eastern, or Yurak proper, exhibiting many common features with Enets - has been spoken in the 18th century in the eastern part of the Nenets ethnic territory (Tas - Yenisei). Partly revised and enlarged version: 1.12, 50-55. |
2.14. Язык двухсот. |
Popular-science paper: The Enets language. |
2.15. Some preliminary data on lexical tonal oppositions in Estonian. |
One section of 2.19. |
2.16. Дудинка по-энецки - Кадута. |
Popular-science paper: The Pre-Russian name of Dudinka. |
2.17. К изучению ненецко-энецких лексических контактов |
Etymology (Enets, Nenets). |
| 2.18. К описанию и диахроническому изучению пермских тональных систем. - In: Конференция „Ностратические языки и ностратическое языкознание“: Тезисы докладов // Институт славяноведения и балканистики АН СССР. Москва, 1977, 38-39. |
More detailed presentation of the topic see in 2.19. |
2.19. Тональные оппозиции в уральских языках REV.: L. Szabó. - Ural-Altaische Jahrbücher 53, 1981, 147. |
New Descriptive Treatment: It turned out to be possible to find auditive differences between two or three tonal pitches (in monosyllabic words/stems) or between two or three tonal contours (in bisyllabic words/stems) in the pronunciation of speakers of many Uralic languages (Finnish, Estonian, Mordvin, Cheremis, Votyak, Zyrian, Hungarian, Enets). These tonal (suprasegmental) distinctions appear to be independent of the segmental properties of words and, though weekly manifested, able to differentiate between segmental homonyms. |
2.20. Notes on the оrigin of prosodic features in some Samoyed and Ugric languages |
Conclusion: The long (overlong) vowels in Nenets correspond to diphtnongs in Enets, Nganasan, and Proto-Northern-Samoyed. In easternmost Nenets dialects, there is a trend to replace the opposition long (overlong) : short by a tonal opposition (falling pitch : rising pitch). Conclusion: The placing of word stress in Selkup is determined by both phonetic and morphologic factors (cf. 1.4). Conclusion: The long vowels in Enets must be treated as biphonemic clusters (cf. 2.41). Conclusion concerning quantity and stess in Hungarian (cf. 2.25). |
2.21. Лексикографические материалы XVIII - начала XIX вв. по саяно-самодийским языкам |
Data Collection, Establishing relationships between primary and secondary sources. Conclision: An unknown manuscript from 1730s - 1740s served as source of Sayan Samoyed data in Pallas’ Zoographia Rosso-Asiatica (1811). This manuscript was found later, s. 2.209. |
2.22. Проблема интерпретации угорско-самодийских и других межгрупповых изоглосс в прауральской реконструкции |
The final and most detailed presentation of the topic see in 1.5. |
2.23. Реконструкция прасеверносамодийских (ПСС) лабиализованных гласных непервых слогов |
Amendments to Reconstruction: Mutually corroborating data from most Samoyed languages suggest the PSam vowel system in non-first syllables was not much different from that of the first syllable. In particular, in place of J. Jahhunen’s *əj etc. in non-first syllables labial vowels should be reconstructed. Reconstructive Description: PSam *o, *oj, *ö, *u, *ü in mon-first syllables. |
| 2.24. Ареальные связи доугорских и досамодийских диалектов уральского праязыка. - In: Вопросы финно-угроведения. Языкознание (Тезисы докладов на XVI Всесоюзной конференции финно-угроведов). Сыктывкар, 1979, 114. |
The final and most detailed presentation of the topic see in 1.5. |
| 2.25. Чередование долгот, консонантный ауслаут и ударение в истории венгерских именных основ - In: Balcanica. Лингвистические исследования. Москва, 1979, 118-133. |
Phonetic Law: The Hungarian monosyllabic nominal stems with quantitative vowel alternation (type nyél : nyelet, víz : vizet) go back to original (Uralic, Proto-Hungarian, borrowed) monosyllabic consonantal stems; the theory of «compensatory lengthening» in such stems is wrong. Conclusion: Proto-Hungarian must have had a stress pattern with non-initial stress and with retraction of stress from high vowels, similar to that in many languages of the Volga-Kama area and in Ossetic (an early form of the Volga-Kama Sprachbund to which Proto-Hungarian belonged in 1. mill.). Conclusion: Hungarian long vowels (except á and those resulting from contraction or monophthongisation) go back to stressed vowels. |
| 2.26. Атрибутивная и неатрибутивная формы числительного ‘два’ - In: СФУ XVI, 1980, № 1, 6-10. |
The final presentation of the topic see in 1.5. |
2.27. Притяжательность (посессивность) и способы ее выражения (предварительный вариант анкеты). Авторы: А. В. Головачева, Вяч. Вс. Иванов, Т. Н. Молошная, Т. М. Николаева, Т. Н. Свешникова, Е. А. Хелимский. |
|
| 2.28. Чередование глагольных шифтеров в селькупском фольклорном повествовании. - In: Структура текста - 81: Тезисы симпозиума // Институт славяноведения и балканистики АН СССР. Москва, 1981, 102-103. |
Description: Instability in using personal / temporal markers (when referring to the same participant / time) in Selkup folklore texts. |
| 2.29. Этимологические заметки по энецкой ономастике - In: СФУ XVII, 1981, № 2, 119-131. |
Etymology (Enets). Partly revised version: 1.12, 82-93. |
| 2.30. Keto-Uralica. - In: Кетский сборник. Антропология, этнография, мифология, лингвистика Ленинград, 1982, 238-251. |
Etymology (Ket, Samoyed, Uralic). |
2.31. К реконструкции мифологических представлений финно-угорских народов Авторы: А. Ю. Айхенвальд, В. Я. Петрухин, Е. А. Хелимский. |
Reconstructive Description. Сf. 2.78. |
| 2.32. Самодийская мифология. - In: Мифы народов мира: Энциклопедия. Т. 2. Москва, 1982, 398-401. |
Description. |
2.33. Финно-угорская мифология. Авторы: В. Я. Петрухин, Е. А. Хелимский. |
Description. |
| 2.34. Прасамодийские серии посессивов и их рефлексы - In: Категория притяжательности в славянских и балканских языках: Тезисы совещания // Институт славяноведения и балканистики АН СССР. Москва, 1983, 107-112. |
Reconstructive Description. Conclusion: Applying internal reconstruction instead of external one produces chronologically aberrant results. Partly revised version: 1.12, 45-49. |
| 2.35. Ранние этапы этногенеза и этнической истории самодийцев в свете языковых данных. - In: Проблемы этногенеза и этнической истории самодийских народов: Тезисы докладов областной научной конференции по лингвистике. Омск, 1983, 5-10. |
See a more detailed presentation of the topic in 2.105. |
| 2.36. Селькупские заимствования в русских диалектах - In: СФУ XIX, 1983, № 3, 202-216. |
Data Collection, Etymology (Russian, Selkup). Partly revised version: 1.12, 363-377. |
| 2.37. Славянское сравнительно-историческое языкознание в США. - In: Славяноведение и балканистика в зарубежных странах. Москва, 1983, 245-287. |
Review Article |
| 2.38. A distinctive feature which became a phoneme: The case of Monguor - In: 5th International Phonology Meeting: Abstracts. Wien, 1984, 27. |
Phonetic Law: In Monguor the Proto-Mongolic non-initial unvoiced consonants underwent «splitting» into a corresponding voiced consonant and an aspiration (equivalent to [- voiced]). This latter produced different unvoicing effects, incl. its transformation into a secondary prothetic fricative in words with vocalic Anlaut. Partly revised version: 1.12, 267. |
| 2.39. On phonology and morphophonology of Mator-Taigi-Karagas (MTK). - In: Dritte Tagung für uralische Phonologie: Kurzfassungen - Abstracts. Wien, 1984, 13-14. |
~ 2.59. The final and most detailed presentation of the topic see in 1.10. |
| 2.40. Permi szófejtések - In: NyK 86, 1984, 1. sz., 196-199. |
Etymology (Permic). Hypothesis: Proto-Permians must have had contacts with such a Turkic language in which *j- changed into a voiced velar consonant, possibly *γ́- (> Perm. g-). |
2.41. Phonological and morphonological properties of quantity in Samoyed |
Conclusion: Enets is a «mora-counting» language (as well as Nganasan, see Hajdú UAJb. 34, NyK 66). are phonologically biphonemic (triphonemic) sequences. |
| 2.42. Problems of phonological reconstruction in modern Uralic Linguistics - In: СФУ XX, 1984, № 4, 241-257. |
Review Article. Сf. 2.51. Conclusion: The future progress can be expected from: (a) search for exact phonetic laws; (b) giving up the oversimplified reconstruction of vowels in non-first syllables and of stem structure; (c) reliable reconstruction of intermediary proto-languages, esp. of the Proto-Ugric. |
| 2.43. Две заметки о славянско-самодийских аналогиях - In: Балто-славянские исследования 1983. Москва, 1984, 114-123. |
Conclusion: The Hávlik's rule (as well as some other trends in the development of reduced vowels and in the rise of palatal correlation in Slavic languages) has direct analogues in Northern Samoyed, especially in Nenets. |
2.44. Критерии классификации диалектов селькупского языка |
Partly revised version: 1.12, 80-81. |
2.45. Установление диалектной принадлежности энецких материалов |
Conclusion: All Enets materials, starting with the earliest sources, represent only two essentially different forms of Enets, corresponding to contemporary Tundra (Somatu, in Voroncovo) and Forest (Pee-Bae, in Potapovo) dialects. |
2.46. Проблема границ ностратической макросемьи языков. |
Review Article |
2.47. Die Feststellung der dialektalen Zugehörigkeit der encischen Materialien. |
German translation of 2.45. |
| 2.48. Proto-Uralic reconstruction in its Nostratic context - In: 6-й Международный конгресс финно-угроведов: Тезисы, т. II. Сыктывкар, 1985, 77. |
Conclusion: The Nostratic comparison may be an effective means of filling gaps ain the reconstruction of Uralic vocabulary and grammar. |
| 2.49. Fenno-ugrica в „ятвяжском“ словаре? - In: Tarptautine baltistų konferencija: Pranešimu tezes. Vilnius, 1985, 234-235. | Conclusion / Hypothesis: The «Yatvingian» word list published by Z. Zinkevičius (Baltistica XXI/1-2) contains several words with obvious correspondences in Finno-Ugric languages, especially in Proto-Hungarian. |
| 2.50. К исторической диалектологии селькупского языка - In: Лексика и грамматика языков Сибири. Барнаул, 1985, 42-58. |
Data Collection: Selkup dialects in the earliest sources (17th - early 19th cent.). Partly revised version: 1.12, 68-79. |
2.51. Проблемы фонологической реконструкции в уральском языкознании. |
Russian version of 2.42. |
2.52. Самодийско-тунгусские лексические связи и их этноисторические импликации |
(The final and most detailed presentation of the topic: 1.21 IN PREPARATION.) |
| 2.53. Etymologica 1-48: Материалы по этимологии маторско-тайгийско-карагасского языка - In: NyK 88, 1986, 119-143. |
Etymology (Mator, Samoyed, Uralic) |
| 2.54. Архивные материалы XVIII века по енисейским языкам - In: Палеоазиатский сборник. Ленинград, 1986, 179-212. |
Unknown Early Sources: Pumpokol, Arin and “Kansk” (Kott) vocabularies from the 18. century. Conclusion: „Kott“ and „Assan“ are the same Yeniseic language. |
2.55. Г. Ф. Миллер и венгерская этимологическая традиция |
Conclusion: The tradition of studying the earliest etymological layers in Hungarian (Uralic stock, Turkic loans) goes back (via Gyarmathi, Schlözer, Fischer) to G. F. Mueller. |
2.56. К изучению и оценке надежности индоевропейско-семитских лексических параллелей. |
Short version of 2.82. |
2.57. О двух фонетических законах в алтайских языках |
See 2.38 and 2.61. |
2.58. О прибалтийско-финском языковом материале в новгородских берестяных грамотах |
Data Collection: Fennic linguistic data in birch-bark letters from Novgorod. Interpretation: The birch-bark letter No. 403 from Novgorod contains a Fennic-Russian glossary. Interpretation: The oldest Fennic text in the birch-bark letter No. 292. Partly revised version: 1.12, 338-348. |
2.59. Опыт фонологической интерпретации данных по маторско-тайгийско-карагасскому языку (МТК). |
~ 2.39. The final and most detailed presentation of the topic see in 1.10. |
2.60. Происхождение древнетюркского чередования r ~ z и дилемма „ротацизма-зетацизма“ |
Phonetic Law: The Proto-Turkic *r2 (*ŕ), still before its change to z, lost its additional feature and merged with *r in most consonant clusters. This phonetic law acconts for most cases of the alternation r ~ z in Turkic as well as for the rare occurrence of z in clusters. |
2.61. Решение дилемм пратюркской реконструкции и ностратика REV.: Б. И. Татаринцев, К согласованию ностратической теории с результатами изучения тюркских языков. - ВЯ, 1989, № 3, 20-32. |
Polemics: Proto-Turkic reconstruction. |
2.62. Труды В. М. Иллич-Свитыча и развитие ностратических исследований за рубежом. |
Review Article Polemics / Conclusion: Anti-Nostratic argumentation by G. Doerfer and others can essentially be used to “refute” the results obtained in any domain of comparative and historical linguistics. |
| 2.63. A „new approach“ to Nostratic comparison - In: Journal of the American Oriental Society 107, 1987, No. 1, 97-100. |
Review (must belong to section 4) of A. R. Bomhard: Toward Proto-Nostratic: A New Approach to Comparison of Proto-Indo-European and Proto-Afroasiatic. |
2.64. Two Mator-Taigi-Karagas vocabularies from the 18th century. REV.: J. Janhunen, On the interaction of Mator with Turkic, Mongolic, and Tungusic. - JSFOu 82, 1989, 287-297. |
Unknown Early Sources: Mator Etymology(Mator) The fnal and most detailed presentation of the material see in 1.10. |
2.65. Встречный двунаправленный отсчет мор в нганасанском языке. |
The final and most detailed presentation of the topic see in 2.132 / 2.159. |
2.66. Глоттохронологическая методика Шилы Эмблтон в приложении к креольским языкам. |
Conclusion / Polemics: Glottochtonological method cannot be applied to dating “mixed” (pidgin, creole) languages. |
2.67. Наблюдения над балтийским языком польско-“ятвяжского“ словарика. |
|
| 2.68. Правило Хонти для венг. fészek и его аналог в маторско-тайгийско-карагасском языке - In: СФУ XXIII, 1987, № 1, 57-60. |
Phonetic Law: The preservation of *-s- as Hungarian -sz- after *p- (L. Honti) is a phonetic law; a similar law is the preservation of *p- as Mator b-/p- before *-s-. |
2.69. „Русский говорка место казать будем“ (Таймырский пиджин) |
Description: The «broken» Russian spoken by older aboriginals on the Taimyr peninsula (govorka) is a language of its own, with a vocabulary mainly of Russian origin and with a grammar of Ural-Altaic type. |
2.70. Finnugor mitológia. Authors: J. Helimszkij, V. Petruhin. |
Hungarian translation of 2.33. |
| 2.71. Szamojéd mitológia. - In: Mitológiai enciklopédia. II. köt. Budapest 1988, 566-570. |
Hungarian translation of 2.32. |
2.72. Király и olasz. К истории ранних славяно-тюрко-венгерских связей Москва, 1988, 53-55. |
Hypothesis: The role of the Turkic ethnicum and language in early post-Conquest Hungary is evidenced i.a. by words (király ‚king‘, olasz ‚Roman, Italian‘) that have been borrowed into Hungarian from Slavic via Turkic. |
| 2.73. *Vele, *bolje - In: ССл, 1988, № 4, 54-59. |
Etymology (Slavic). Partly revised version: 1.12, 325-330. |
2.74. Венгерский язык как источник для праславянской реконструкции и реконструкции славянского языка Паннонии. |
Ab abstract of 2.75. |
2.75. Венгерский язык как источник для праславянской реконструкции и реконструкции славянского языка Паннонии |
Reconstructive Description: The Slavic dialect (language) of Pannonia as evidenced in its substrate influence on Hungarian.Approach followed in the dissertation by Ron Richards. Partly revised version: 1.12, 416-432. |
2.76. К истории этноязыковой ситуации в центре Азии: данные маторско-тайгийско-карагасского языка |
Hypothesis: The ethnocultural border between Sayan Samoyeds and Altaic (Turkic, but also Tungusic and Mongolic) peoples has been extremely stable for ca. 1,500 years; unlike many peoples of Eurasia, Sayan Samoyeds seem to have been little disturbed by military activities of their immediate Altaic neighbours. |
2.77. Славянский интердиалект в Венгрии Арпадов? |
More detailed presentation of the topic see in 2.86. |
2.78. On earliest Finno-Ugrian mythologic beliefs: Comparative and historical considerations for reconstruction. |
Hungarian translation of 2.31. |
2.79. Samoyedic mythology: Dynamic phenomena and the problem of archaic layers. |
Conclusion: Anti-stadial approach: Inconsequencies and heterogenities in mythology may be stable rather than indicate a transitoty state. Typologically pure mythologies can hardly exist. |
| 2.80. Глубинно-фонологический изосиллабизм ненецкого стиха - In: JSFOu 82, 1989, 223-268. |
Conclusion: The versification in Northern Samoyed is dominated by the principle of isosyllabicity of lines; they normally contain six syllables each in epic and other secular poetry, and eight syllables (cf. the Kalevala metre) in sacral poetry (shamanic incantations). |
2.81. Изучение ранних славяно-венгерских языковых отношений (Материалы и интерпретации. Вопрос об этноязыковых контактах венгров с восточными славянами) |
Review Article. |
2.82. К оценке надежности индоевропейско-семитских лексических сопоставлений |
Conclusion: Hypotheses of distant relationship, even when supported by claims to have discovered “phonetic laws”, can be refuted by presenting “cognate series” of the same quality, which illustrate other, obviously wrong “phonetic laws”. |
2.83. Самодийская лингвистическая реконструкция и праистория самодийцев. |
= 2.105. Partly revised version: 1.12, 13-25. |
| 2.84. Селькупские материалы в рукописном наследии Л. А. Варковицкой - In: СФУ XXV, 1989, № 1, 51-53. Авторы: А. И. Кузнецова, Е. А. Хелимский |
Data Collection. |
| 2.85. Силлабика стиха в нганасанских иносказательных песнях - In: Музыкальная этнография Северной Азии. Новосибирск , 1989, 52-76. |
Description: Nganasan allegoric songs (kəjŋəirśa) as a folklore genre, their textual properties. |
2.86. Славянское койне в Венгрии Арпадов и происхождение слaвяно-венгерских топонимов в Трансильвании |
Hypothesis: Pannonian Slavic was used as a Slavic koine in different parts of historical Hungary (including e.g. Transylvania and Banat); non-Slavic population of the country used it rather than local Slavic dialects. Therefore many substrate toponyms and other loanwords in Hungarian, obviously |
| 2.87. The external connections and early contacts of the Uralic languages - In: Problems of Uralistics: Analytical reviews, vol. I. Moscow, 1990, 19-43. |
Review Article |
2.88. Octosyllabic and hexasyllabic verse in Northern Samoyed. |
Based on 2.80. |
| 2.89. Once more on the ethnonym „Tungus“ - In: Specimina Sibirica III: Gedenksschrift für Irén N. Sebestyén. Quinqueecclesiae, 1990, 67-71. Authors: E. Helimski, J. Janhunen. |
Etymology. |
2.90. A plea for combining synchrony and diachrony in the descriptions of Uralic dialects. |
= 2.91 |
2.91. A plea for combining synchrony and diachrony in the descriptions of Uralic dialects. |
= 2.90 |
| 2.92. Ugrica: Этимологии с историко-фонетическим подтекстом - In: NyK 91, 1990, 63-68. |
Amendments to reconstruction, Phonetic Laws: Several Uralic, Ob-Ugric, Hungarian reconstructions and phonetic rules made more precise by etymological analysis. |
2.93. Идеи и сферы исследований Пауля Аристэ на международной конференции по урало-индоевропеистике. |
A more detailed presentation of the topic see in 2.156 |
2.94. К корпусу ранних славянских заимствований венгерского языка |
Etymology (Hungarian). |
2.95. Славянские (новгородско-псковские) заимствования в прибалтийско-финских языках: -a и -u в рефлексах имен мужского рода |
Conclusion: In early Fennic borrowings from (Northern) Slavic and early (Novgorodian) Russian the final *ə of original masculine o-stems is reflected as a/ä, while the final *u (ъ) of original u-stems is reflected as u/ü. |
2.96. „Смешанные“ состояния и типологическая реконструкция |
Conclusion: Anti-stadial approach: Any attempts to reconstruct „typologically pure“ proto-languages (purely agglutinative, with purely „active“ Sprachbau, etc.) are ill-adviced, because typologically pure languages do not exist. |
2.97. Уральский консонантный ауслаут ~ индоевропейская гетероклиза? - In: Конференция „Сравнительно-историческое языкознание на современном этапе: Памяти В. М. Иллич-Свитыча“: Тезисы докладов // Институт славяноведения и балканистики АН СССР. Москва, 1990, 11-13. |
Phonetic Law: It is probable that there exists a correlation between monosyllavic consonantal stems in Proto-Uralic and heteroclytic stems in Proto-Indo-European (the source of both phenomena must the belong to the Nostratic level). |
| 2.98. Этимологические заметки - In: Исследования по исторической грамматике и лексикологии. Москва, 1990, 30-42. |
Etymology (Russian). Partly revised version: 1.12, 353-357. |
2.99. Does the language of spirits influence the development of human language? (Evidence from Northern Samoyed). |
An abstract of 2.114. |
| 2.100. On the interaction of Mator with Turkic, Mongolic, and Tungusic: A rejoinder - In: JSFOu 83, 1991, 257-267. |
Polemics, Data Collection: Proto-Turkic (or Early Turkic) and Tungusic loanwords in Mator. Partly revised version: 1.12, 292-300. |
2.101. Slavic/Latin/German stress and Hungarian vowel harmony. |
An abstract of 2.111. |
2.102. К топохронологии уральско-алтайских этноязыковых связей. |
Review Article. |
2.103. О нескольких лексических реликтах новгородской и севернорусской колонизации |
Etymology (Uralic languages - borrowings from Russian). Partly revised version: 1.12, 349-350. |
2.104. Об одном диакритическом приеме создания древнетюркского рунического алфавита |
Conclusion: The Turkic runic letters for “z” and “š” are derived from those for “r” and “l” with the same diacritic sign as the letter for “ń” is derived from that for “n”; this proves that at the time when the runic alphabet was created the later “z” and “š” were still pronounced as “ŕ” and “ĺ”. |
2.105. Самодийская лингвистическая реконструкция и праистория самодийцев |
Hypotheses: System of arguments, based mainly on loanword studies and linguistic paleontology, for the localisation of the Samoyed proto-home (around the quadrangle Krasnoyarsk - Yeniseisk - Narym - Tomsk), for determining the chronology and the routes of subsequent migrations, for tracing the formation of individual branches. An especially important role in the history of Samoyed languages was played by their contacts to Tungusic. |
| 2.106. Bisyllabic consonantal and trisyllabic vocalic stems in Fenno-Permian and further - In: Rédei-Festschrift. Wien - Budapest, 1992, 195-200. |
Amendments to Reconstruction. Partly revised version: 1.12, 191-195. |
2.107. Comments on K. Rowenchuk’s Paper. |
Issues of Nostratic studies |
2.108. Incorporation of elements of Russian orthodoxy and Soviet ideology into shamanism. |
Short version of 2.116. |
| 2.109. Pequeñas sesiones de un gran chamán nganasan. - In: Diógenes 158, 1992, Abril - Junio, 39-54. Authors: E. A. Helimski, N. T. Kosterkina. |
Partly revised Spanish translation of 2.126. |
2.110. Petites séances d'un grand chamane nganasan. |
Partly revised French translation of 2.126. |
2.111. Slavic/Latin/German stress and Hungarian vowel harmony |
Phonetic Law: When words containing both back and front vowels were borrowed into Hungarian from European languages, their harmonic class was determined by the stressed vowel of the source word. |
| 2.112. Small séances with a great Nganasan Shaman. - In: Diogenes 158, 1992, April - June, 39-55. Authors: E. A. Helimski, N. T. Kosterkina. |
Partly revised English translation of 2.126. |
| 2.113. Etymologica 49-79: Материалы по этимологии маторско-тайгийско-карагасского языка - In: NyK 93, 1992-1993, 101-123. |
Etymology (Mator, Samoyed, Uralic) |
2.114. Does the language of spirits influence the development of human language? (Evidence from Northern Samoyed |
Hypothesis: Certain typological properties of archaic Uralic languages (Fennic, Lappish, Samoyed) seem to be determined by the requirements of metrical (shamanic or epic) poetry, and their stability is due to the primary relevance of the poetic (aestetic) function of the language (also in comparison with the communicative function, etc.). |
| 2.115. Samoyedic vocabularies from the 18. century: A list of archive manuscripts - In: Ural-Altaische Jahrbücher: Neue Folge, Bd. 12, 1993, 249-265. |
Data Collection. |
2.116. Заимствования из православной религии и советской идеологии в ритуальной практике нганасанского шамана |
Conclusion: The shamanistic rites of the Nganasans are open to external influences; elements from both Russian Orthodoxy and Soviet ideology are interpreted and incorporated in the same way. |
2.117. Краткий обзор основных этапов истории советского славяноведения. |
Review Article |
| 2.118. Маторско-тайгийско-карагасский язык. - In: Языки мира: Уральские языки. Москва, 1993, 372-379. |
The final and most detailed presentation of the topic see in 1.10. |
2.119. Прасамодийские *ə™ и *ə¨: прауральские источники и нганасанские рефлексы |
Conclusion: The system of vowel harmony in Nganasan reflects the historical rather than contemporary relationship between velar and palatal vowels. |
2.120. Ранняя славянская христианская терминология в венгерском языке. 1993, 117-118. |
An abstract of 2.121. |
2.121. Ранняя славянская христианская терминология в венгерском языке |
Data Collection |
| 2.122. Селькупский язык. - In: Языки мира: Уральские языки. Москва, 1993, 356-371. |
Description. The content mainly repeats 1.4. |
2.123. Cultural traditions in the Taimyr North: Studies in the languages and cultures of the Nganasans and the Enets |
Review Article |
2.124. Factors of Russianisation in Siberia and linguo-ecological strategies |
Short version of 2.154. |
2.125. Proto-Lappisch und Samojedisch im Lichte der heutigen samojedologischen Forschung. |
An abstract of 2.150. |
2.126. Малые камлания большого шамана |
Description |
2.127. Нганасанская кириллическая графика и фонологическая транскрипция. |
|
2.128. Нганасанские заимствования в долганском языке: к выходу в свет долганского словаря М.Стаховского |
Etymology (Dolgan). Partly revised version: 1.12, 320-322. |
2.129. Нганасанско-русские языковые связи |
Description. |
2.130. Номинативная мини-загадка: На стыке загадки, метафоры и лексического субститута |
Conclusion: At least in some languages of Siberia (Uralic and non-Uralic), very short nominative metaphoric riddles (of the type: „What is it: a [living] labaz? - An elk.“) serve as a source of non-trivial semantic developments and of lexical replacements. |
2.131. От редактора |
|
2.132. Очерк морфонологии и словоизменительной морфологии нганасанского языка. |
Description, with numerous elements of New Descriptive Treatment: |
2.133. Первое камлание. Второе камлание |
Data Collection: Publication of the texts of incantations sung during two Nganasan shamanic séances. |
2.134. Презентация текстов и лексико-грамматические пометы |
|
2.135. Таймырский пиджин - „Говорка“. |
A more detailed presentation of the topic see in 2.173. |
2.136. Указатель слов к текстам камланий. |
Data Collection. A word-index to 2.133. |
2.137. Уральские народы во взаимодействии с Русью и новгородскими славянами: проблемы интерпретации лингвистических данных |
|
| 2.138. Языковая ситуация в России - In: Грани XLIX, 1994, № 172, 302-314. |
Conclusion: Problems and contradictions in the issues of language policy and language planning are inevitable; the main dilemma is that of individual freedom vs. preservation of minor languages. |
2.139. Nganasan as a literary language - and further reflections on literary languages |
Conclusion: Without having ever had a written form, the Nganasan possesses all properties of a standard, cultivated language. Conclusion: The „typical“ ways of developing standard written languages for ethnic minorities are often misleading and counterproductive. Partly revised Russian translation: 1.12, 162-163. |
2.140. Proto-Uralic gradation: Continuation and traces REV.: A. Künnap, On the interrelationship between *ś- and *j-preterite bin Uralic languages. - UAJb. N. F. 16, 1999/2000, 139-142. |
Phonetic Laws: (the R-S-Model): Consonant gradation in its original form affects (phonetically) all consonants and consonant clusters. Rhythmic gradation weakens the initial articulatory phase of consonants placed between an even-numbered (unstressed) and an odd-numbered (stressed) vowel. Syllabic gradation weakens the final articulatory phase of consonants in the beginning of a closed syllable. Syllabic gradation affects only those consonants that remain unaffected by rhythmic gradation. |
| 2.141. The Proto-Uralic origin of consonant gradation - In: Московский Лингвистический Журнал 1. Москва, 1995, 34-40. |
Short version of 2.140. |
2.142. Samoyedic loans in Turkic: Check-list of etymologies |
Data Collection, Etymology. Partly revised Russian translation: 1.12, 301-312. |
| 2.143. Turco - Samoiedica - In: Folia Orientalia 31. Kraków, 1995, 39-52. Authors: E. Helimski, M. Stachowski. |
Etymology. |
| 2.144. Загадки-иносказания в нганасанском фольклоре - In: Малые формы фольклора: Сборник статей памяти Г. Л. Пермякова. Москва, 1995, 270-282. |
Description: Riddles as a specific form of Nganasan allegoric songs (kəjŋəirśa), see 2.85. Partly revised version: 1.12, 110-117. |
| 2.145. Сверхдревние германизмы в прибалтийско-финском и других финно-угорских языках: История проблемы в краткой аннотированной и комментированной библиографии - In: Этноязыковая и этнокультурная история Восточной Европы. Москва, 1995, 3-37 |
Review Article, Polemics. Conclusion: The studies by J. Kovulento and his followers demonstrate a massive misuse of the etymological method, induced by its similar misuse in contemporary Indo-European linguistics (the extremes of laryngealism and of the theory of determinatives, etc.). Only very few new etymologies stemming from the research of this school deserve attention. Partly revised version: 1.12, 511-535. |
| 2.146. Фактор Мангазейского морского хода в этнонимии и топонимии - In: Славянские языки в зеркале неславянского окружения: Тезисы международной конференции // Институт славяноведения и балканистики РАН. Москва, 1996, 74-76. |
Hypothesis: There were three ways of Russian penetration in Siberia: the southern route (approximately along the future Transsiberian Railway), the Yugra route, and the Mangazeya sea route (through the Samoyed regions). The latter played a foremost role for the earliest penetration to Central and Eastern Siberia, as attested by linguistic evidence. Partly revised version: 1.12, 351-352. |
| 2.147. Этническое сознание и темпы языковой эволюции - In: Этническое и языковое самосознание: Материалы конференции // Институт народов России. Москва, 1995, 157-159 |
Conclusion: In two essentially different situations, ethnic conciousness slows down language evolution (preventing the desintegration of a dialectal space) or precipitates language degradation (urging people to imitate speaking a language which they do not master). |
| 2.148. The Enets text of the Lord's Prayer from Witsen's Book - In: Ünnepi könyv Mikola Tibor tiszteletére // Szerk.: Mészáros E. Szeged, 1996, 125-132. |
Interpretation: The earliest Enets text: Phonological reconstruction and dialectological analysis. Partly revised version: 1.12, 60-67. |
| 2.149a. ’Govorka’ - the pidgin Russian of the Taymyr Peninsular area - In: Atlas of Languages of Intercultural Communication in the Pacific, Asia, and the Americas // Ed. by S. A. Wurm a.o. Vol. II.1. Berlin, 1996, 1033-1034 + Map 110. |
A more detailed presentation of the topic see in 1.10. |
| 2.149b. Selkup as lingua franca - In: Atlas of Languages of Intercultural Communication in the Pacific, Asia, and the Americas // Ed. by S. A. Wurm a.o. Vol. II.1. Berlin, 1996, 1035 + Map 110. |
Description. |
| 2.150. Protolappisch und Samojedisch: die vorgeschlagenen Wortgleichungen im Lichte der heutigen etymologischen Forschung - In: Lapponica et Uralica: 100 Jahre finnisch-ugrischer Unterricht an der Universität Uppsala // Hrsg. von L.-G. Larsson. Uppsala, 1996, 51-69. Russian version |
Data Collection, Etymology. Conclusion: The theory which suggest the Samoyed origin of the “Protolappisch” language is inacceptable. Conclusion: There is no evidence for any intensive or prolonged contacts betrween Saami and Samoyeds. Partly revised Russian translation: 1.12, 202-217. |
| 2.151. The southern neighbours of Finno-Ugrians: Iranians or an extinct branch of Aryans („Andronovo Aryans“)? - In: Symposium „Finnisch-ugrische Sprachen in Kontakt“: Abstracts. Groningen, 1996, 27. |
An abstract of 2.155. |
| 2.152. Tágra nyíljék! - In: Ünnepi könyv Domokos Péter tiszteletére // Szerk. Bereczki A, Klima L. Budapest, 1996, 114. |
Etymology (Hungarian, Samoyed, Uralic). |
| 2.153. Очерк истории самодийских народов - In: Финно-угорский мир // Ред. Д. Нановски. Будапешт, 1996, 101-115. |
Description. New Descriptive Treatment: Ample use of linguistic results (see 2.83, etc.) in historical treatment. Partly revised version: 1.12, 26-40. |
| 2.154. Factors of Russianisation in Siberia and linguo-ecological strategies - In: Northern Minority Languages: Problems of Survival // Ed. by H. Shoji and J. Janhunen (Senri Ethnological Studies no. 44). Osaka, 1997, 77-91. |
Description: The current sociolinguistic situation of Nganasan and Enets. Conclusion: The spread of native-Russian bilingualism, in its present form and under the present conditions, is purely detrimental from the viewpoint of linguistic ecology, leading inevitably to the loss of minor indigenous languages of Siberia. Conclusion: The chances for minor language preservation in Siberia, if any, consist in strengthening “ethnic barriers”, in cultivating cultural and social distinctiveness (but are we linguists ready to present ourselves as the proponents of an apartheid?). |
| 2.155. The southern neighbours of Finno-Ugrians: Iranians or an extinct branch of Aryans („Andronovo Aryans“)? - In: Finnisch-ugrische Sprachen in Kontakt. Vorträge des Symposiums aus Anlaß des 30-jährigen Bestehens der Finnougristik an der Rijksuniversitejt Groningen 21.-23. November 1996. Maastricht, 1997, 117-125. Handouts |
Hypothesis: A considerable part of Aryan borrowings in Finno-Ugric languages stems neither from Proto-Aryan nor from Iranian (or Indic), but from “Andronovo” Aryan which goes back directly to Proto-Aryan and existed from ca. 18th/16th till ca. 9th/7th cent. BC simulataneously with Proto-Indo-Iranian, later with Early Indic and Early Iranian. English version of 2.164. |
| 2.156. Uralo-Indogermanica. Балто-славянские языки и проблема урало-индоевропейских связей - In: Балто-славянские исследования 1988-1996. Москва, 1997, 224-249. |
Review Article. Comments to a conference in Moscow (1990) and its proceedings. |
| 2.157. Два шишá: Turkic šiš(ik) and Fennic hīsi in Russian - In: Studia Etymologica Cracoviensia 2. Kraków, 1997, 151-157. |
Etymology (Russian). Partly revised version: 1.12, 358-362. |
| 2.158. Юкагирский язык - In: Языки мира: Палеоазиатские языки. Москва, 1997, 155-168. Авторы: И.А.Николаева, Е. А. Хелимский. |
Description, with numerous elements of New Descriptive Treatment: Yukagir grammar basically reconsidered in comparison with the description suggested by E. A. Krejnovič. Conclusion: The specific system of 3 verbal conjugations in Yukagir derives from a system in which the rhema of a sentence was obligatorily treated as its grammatical predicate. |
| 2.159. Nganasan - In: The Uralic Languages // Ed. by D. Abondolo. London - New York, 1997, 480-515. |
See 2.132. |
| 2.160. Selkup - In: The Uralic Languages // Ed. by D. Abondolo. London - New York, 1997, 548-579. |
Description. The content mainly repeats 1.4. |
| 2.161. [Diskussionsbeiträge] - In: XI. medzinárodny zjazd slavistov. Záznamy z diskusje k predmeseny´m referátom. Bratislava, 1998, 32-35, 63-65, 82-84, 136-137, 443-444. |
Polemics, i.a. on 2.121. Etymology (Slavic, Russian). Partly → 2.165. |
| 2.162. Поздняя праславянская фонетика в свете данных финно-угорских языков - In: XII. Międzynarodowy Kongres Slawistów. Streszczenia referatów i komunikatów: Językoznawstwo. Warszawa, 1998, 197. |
Amendments to Reconstruction: Establishing of genuine phonetic values of Late Common Slavic letters/sounds/phonemes in view of data from borrowings (corroborated by many other considerations). |
| 2.163. Тюркские лексические раритеты в маторском языке - In: Studia Turcologica Cracoviensia 5. Kraków, 1998, 125-134. |
Etymology (Mator, Turkic): A selection based on the materials and explanations in 1.10. Partly revised version: 1.12, 313-319. |
| 2.164. Южные соседи финно-угров: иранцы или исчезнувшая ветвь ариев (арии-андроновцы)? - In: ΠΟΛΥΤΡΟΠΟΝ: к 70-летию Владимира Николаевича Топорова. Москва, 1998, 61-72. |
See 2.155. Partly revised version: 1.12, 502-510. |
| 2.165. К интерпретации древнерусских текстов: 1. Нарцы; 2. Шестники - Балто-славянские исследования 1997. Москва, 1998, 563-569. |
Interpretation. Partly revised version: 1.12, 333-337. |
| 2.166. Umlaut in Diachronie - Ablaut in Synchronie: Urostjakischer Umlaut und ostjakischer Ablaut - In: Diachronie in der synchronen Sprachbeschreibung: Materialien zum Internationalen Uralistischen Symposium: Hamburg, 6.-10. Oktober 1999 // Hrsg. von E. Helimski (MSUA 21). Hamburg, 1999, 39-44. Handouts |
A more detailed presentation of the topic see in 2.189. |
| 2.167. Underlying stem shapes in Hungarian: An outline of an alternative approach - In: Diachronie in der synchronen Sprachbeschreibung: Materialien zum Internationalen Uralistischen Symposium: Hamburg, 6.-10. Oktober 1999 // Hrsg. von E. Helimski (MSUA 21). Hamburg, 1999, 45-47. |
Description: Principles and examples of presenting underlying morphonological shapes of Hungarian nominal stems (differing from the system suggested in D. Abondolo, Hungarian Inflectional Morphology). New Descriptive Treatment: The treatment of Hungarian stems with a half-closed connecting vowel as „vocalic“ stems (with an original narrow Auslaut vowel) and those with an open connecting vowel as „consonantal“ stems is historically more adequate and leads to a more economic morphonological description. |
| 2.168. Ural. *läs ‘bei, in der Nähe’ im Samojedischen (und im Ungarischen?) - In: Finnisch-Ugrische Mitteilungen 21/22, 1999, 77-81. |
Etymology (Uralic). |
| 2.169. Einige Angaben zu Toponymie und Ethnonymie des sajansamojedischen Siedlungsgebietes aus den Jahren 1739-1740 bei G. F. Mueller - In: Europa et Sibiria: Gedenkband für Wolfgang Veenker (VdSUA 51) // Hrsg. von C. Hasselblatt und P. Jääsalmi-Krüger. Wiesbaden, 1999, 181-189. |
Unknown Early Sources: G. F. Muellers data on Sayan Samoyed tribe names and on place names of Upper Yenisei and adjacent regions. |
| 2.170. On probable Tungus-Manchurian origin of the Buyla inscription from Nagy-Szentmiklós - In: Studia Etymologica Cracoviensia 5. Kraków, 2000, 43-56. German version, Handouts |
Interpretation: The «Buyla inscription» in Greek letters on a dish from the Nagy-Szentmiklós is interpreted as written in a language close to Pre-Manchu. Hypothesis: A population of Manchu-Tungus origin played a prominent role in the European Avar Qaghanate. Partly revised version: 1.12, 268-277. Reprinted as second part in 1.18. |
| 2.171. Early Indo-Uralic linguistic relationships: Real kinship and imagined contacts - In: Early Contacts Between Uralic and Indo-European: Linguistic and Archaeological Considerations. (MSFOu 242) // Ed. by C. Carpelan, A. Parpola and P. Koskikallio. Helsinki, 2001. 187-205. Abstract Handouts |
Polemics: The kinship theory (Nostratic theory) explains the cumulative evidence of the most ancient Indo-Uralic parallels better than any contact theories. Issues of direct and lateral (areal) kinship, gradual loss of kinship transparency, etc. Hypothesis: Counting and numerals were a culrtural innovation that spread in Eurasia ca. 5,000-6,000 years ago, therefore the presence/absence of common numerals correlate with the age of language families. Partly revised version: 1.12, 489-501. |
| 2.172. Мифология и религия уральских народов - In: 1.12, 230-240. |
See 2.214. |
| 2.173. „Говорка“ - таймырский пиджин на русской лексической основе - In: 1.12, 378-395. English version |
Description. New Descriptive Treatment: Ural-Altaic typological substratum, Features of the “post-Govorka continuum”. |
| 2.174. Лексико-семантические раритеты в ранних славянских заимствованиях венгерского языка - In: 1.12, 452-455. |
Etymology (Slavic, Hungarian). |
| 2.175. Язык(и) аваров: тунгусо-маньчжурский аспект - In: Folia Orientalia 36 (Studia in Honorem Stanislai Stachowski Dicata). Kraków 2000, 135-148. |
Etymology: Etymological evidence in favour of the Hypothesis of Manchu-Tungus origin of European Avars (avar, Bayan, бояр-). Cf. 2.208. Reprinted as third part in 1.18. |
| 2.176. К оценке современной языковой ситуации в России с точки зрения лингвоэкологии. - In: Res Linguistica: K 60-летию В. П. Нерознака. Mосква 2000, 238-248. |
See 2.138 |
| 2.177. Umlaut in Diachronie - Ablaut in Synchronie: Urostjakischer Umlaut und ostjakischer Ablaut - In: Проблемы изучения дальнего родства языков на рубеже третьего тысячелетия: Доклады и тезисы научной конференции 29 мая - 2 июня 2000 г. Москва 2000, 194-200. Handouts |
A more detailed presentation of the topic see in 2.189. |
| 2.178. On „eye-witnessed“ ethnic hostilities in the Taimyr North: Critical remarks to the „Tundroviki“ by D. G. Anderson - In: Siberia and the Circumpolar North: Contributions by Anthropologists and NGOs. Wien, 2000, 26-27. |
Short version of 4.43. |
| 2.179. Before the Uralians came: White spots on the historical language map of Northern Eurasia and the Uralic languages - In: Congressus Nonus Internationalis Fenno-Ugristarum. Pars II. Tartu 2000, 72-73. |
An abstract of 2.192. |
| 2.180. A szamojéd népek vázlatos története. - In: Nyelvrokonaink / Szerk. Nanovfszky György. Budapest, 2000, 109-120. |
= 1.9. |
| 2.181. A szamojéd nyelvek. - In: Nyelvrokonaink / Szerk. Nanovfszky György. Budapest, 2000, 287-290. Szerzök: Helimszkij J., Nagy Imre Cs. |
= 3.141. Cf. 2.185. |
| 2.182. A nganaszan nyelv. - In: Nyelvrokonaink / Szerk. Nanovfszky György. Budapest, 2000, 299-301. Szerzök: Helimszkij J., Nagy Imre Cs. |
= 3.140. Cf. 2.186, 2.211. |
| 2.183. A szölkup nyelv. - In: Nyelvrokonaink / Szerk. Nanovfszky György. Budapest, 2000, 303-304. Szerzök: Helimszkij J., Nagy Imre Cs. |
= 3.142. Cf. 2.187, 2.212. |
| 2.184. Очерк истории самодийских народов. - In: Сородичи по языку // Ред. Д. Нановски. Будапешт, 2000, 130-144. |
= 2.153. |
| 2.185. Cамодийскиe языки. - In: Сородичи по языку // Ред. Д. Нановски. Будапешт, 2000, 345-348. Авторы: Ч. Надь Имре, Е. А. Хелимский. |
Russian translation of 2.181. |
| 2.186. Нганасанский язык. - In: Сородичи по языку // Ред. Д. Нановски. Будапешт, 2000, 355-357. Авторы: Ч. Надь Имре, Е. А. Хелимский. |
Russian translation of 2.182. |
| 2.187. Селькупский язык. - In: Сородичи по языку // Ред. Д. Нановски. Будапешт, 2000, 358-360. Авторы: Ч. Надь Имре, Е. А. Хелимский. |
Russian translation of 2.183. |
| 2.188. Глоттализация в языках средней Сибири - In: Евразийское пространство: Звук и слово. Международная конференция 3-6 сентября 2000: Тезисы и материалы. Москва 2000, 17-18. |
Conclusion: The glottal stop in Samoyed, the glottalized tonal pitch („the second tone“) in Ket, and the pharyngealisation in Sayan Turkic are essentially the same phenomenon, consisting in the rise of a seconary glottal articulation of word-final consonants. Amendments to Reconstruction (implicit): At least in this point S. Starostin’s Yeniseic reconstruction needs a correction. |
| 2.189. Ablaut als Umlaut im Ostjakischen: Prinzipien und Grundzüge der lautgeschichtlichen Betrachtung - In: Fremd und Eigen: Untersuchungen zu Grammatik und Wortschatz des Uralischen und Indogermanischen, in memoriam Hartmut Katz. Wien: Edition Praesens, 2001, 55-76. |
Reconstructive Description, Phonetic Laws: The vowel alternations in Ostyak result from an Umlaut-type development under the influence of the the Proto-Ostyak vowels of the second syllable, which later mostly disappeared or lost their distinctive qualities (Ablaut from Umlaut). In many stems these Umlaut-type developments took place in all paradigmatic forms and derivates, so that there are no synchronic vowel alternations in such stems (Umlaut without Ablaut). Conclusion: The vocalism of the first syllable of Vogul and Permic, partly perhaps also of Hungarian and Cheremis, underwent similar developments, though in a smaller extent and only exceptionally resulting in vowel alternations. Approach to Proto-Ostyak reconstruction followed in the dissertation by Mihail Zhivlov. |
| 2.190. Der Ostjakische Vokalwechsel und die natürlichen Gesetze der Lautentwickling (Paar Kommentare zu Hontis Diskussionsbeitrag) - In: FUM 23. Hamburg 1999 (2001), 39-44. |
Polemics: Stressing and making more explicit some claims and results in 2.177 and 2.189. |
| 2.191. Samojedic studies: A state-of-the-art report - In: Finnisch-Ugrische Forschungen, Bd. 56, Ht. 1-3. Helsinki 2001: 175-216. Addenda |
Review article. |
| 2.192. Уральцы и их предшественники: Белые пятна на этноисторической карте Северной Евразии и уральские языки - In: Congressus Nonus Internationalis Fenno-Ugristarum. 7.-13. 8. 2000 Tartu. Pars IV: Dissertationes sectionum: Linguistica I. Red. Tõnu Seilenthal. Tartu 2001. 332-336. |
Review Article, Hypotheses: Presumable early substrata in Uralic languages (“Protolappisch”, “Proto-Yugra”, ”sihirtya”, possible pre-Uralic population of the Russian North and of the Taimyr peninsula), possibilities and sources for studying them. |
| 2.193. PU *iÇś ‘to cause to be, to be’ and some other core vocabulary items in Proto-Uralic: Remarks on etymology and reconstruction - In: Budapesti Uráli Műhely II. Szófejtő Műhely 1999. szeptember 8-10. Budapest: MTA Nyelvtudományi Intézet, 2001. 76-84. Abstract |
Etymology, Amendments to Reconstruction (Uralic). |
| 2.194. Zu den ossetischen Lehnwörtern im Ungarischen - In: Finnougrier und Indoeuropäer: Kontakte der Sprachen, Kontakte der Literaturen. Finno-Ugrians and Indo-Europeans: Linguistic and Literary Contacts. Internationales Symposium, 22.-24. November 2001, Groningen. Programm / Abstracts / Zusammenfassungen. Hrsg. von R. Blockland und C. Hasselblatt. Groningen 2001. 27. |
An abstract of 2.200. |
| 2.195. Samoyedic studies: Successes and Perspectives - In: Vade mecum! A huszonötödik óra. (Az Uralisztikai Tanszék kiadványai 9). Szombathely 2001. 123-136. Handouts |
Partly repeates (in abridged form) 2.191. |
| 2.196. „Этническая рознь“ на Таймырском Севере (кто ищет, тот всегда найдет...) - In: Сибирская заимка: Профессиональный подход к изучению Сибири (link). Вахтин |
= 4.43. |
| 2.197. Verzeichnis der Rara aus dem Nachlaß von Wolfgang Steinitz. Uralistik, Sprachen und Völker des Nordens - In: Berliner Beiträge zur Hungarologie 12, 2001. 181-209. Verf.: E. Helimski, G. Sauer |
Data Collection. |
| 2.198. Paul Johansen als Philologe und Etymologe - In: Reden und Vorträge auf der Festveranstaltung am 14. Dezember 2001 aus Anlaß des 100. Geburtstages von Prof. Fr. Paul Johansen (23. 12. 1901 - 19. 04. 1965). Hamburg 2002. 34-46. |
Description. Conclusion: Johansen’s polyhistoric approach to etymology is superior to narrow limguistic professionalism in etymologic studies. = 2.225 |
| 2.199. Eine Regel der Konsonantenkompatibilität im Ostjakischen - In: Wŭśa wŭśa - Sei gegrüßt!: Beiträge zur Finnougristik zu Ehren von Gert Sauer dargebracht zu seinem siebzigsten Geburtstag (VdSUA 57) // Hrsg. von E. Helimski und A. Widmer. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 2002. 111-116. |
Phonetic Law: Dental and cacuminal stops and nasals do not co-occur in the same (non-borrowed) stem in Ostyak. |
| 2.200. Zu den iranischen Lehnwörtern im Ungarischen - In: Finno-Ugrians and Indo-Europeans: Linguistic and Literary Contacts. Proceedings of the Symposium at the University of Groningen, November 22-24, 2001 (Studia Fenno-Ugrica Groningana 2) // Ed. by R. Blokland and C. Hasselblatt. Maastricht: Shaker, 2002. 105-111. Handouts |
Data Collection, Etymology: Iranian/Alan/Ossetic loanwords in Hungarian: A systematisation. |
| 2.201. Таймыр, нижний Енисей и бассейн Таза в начале XVIII века: заметки Г. Ф. Миллера по этнологии, этнонимии и топонимии Мангазейского уезда - In: Языки мира. Типология. Уралистика: Памяти Т. Ждановой: Статьи и воспоминания. Москва: Индрик, 2002. 592-616. |
Unknown Early Sources: G. F. Muellers data on ethnology, tribe names and place names of Lower Yenisei and adjacent regions. |
| 2.202. Словарь Ф. Г. Мальцева (1903) и особенности языка енисейских селькупов - In: Лингвистический беспредел: Сборник статей к 70-летию А. И. Кузнецовой. Москва: Изд-во Московского унта, 2002. 155-170. |
Partly revised Russian translation of the sections I-II in 1.13. |
| 2.203. Трансъевразийские аспекты русской этимологии In: Русский язык в научном освещении 2 (4). Москва, 2002. 75-90. |
Review Article, Etymology (Russian). |
| 2.204. Тунгусо-маньчжурский языковой компонент в Аварском каганате и славянская этимология - In: Zbornik povzetkov / 13. Mednarodni slavistični kongres, Ljubljana, 15.-21. avgusta 2003. 1. del: Jezikoslovje // Ured. F. Novak. Ljubljana: ZRC SAZU, 2003. 140-141. |
An abstract of 1.18. |
| 2.205. Bécs und Pécs vor dem Hintergrund der ungarischen Vertretung der slawischen Nasalvokale - In: Ünnepi könyv Honti László tiszteletére // Szerk. Bakró-Nagy Marianne, Rédei Károly. Budapest: MTA Nyelvtudományi Intézet, 2003. 181-193. |
Etymology (Slavic, Hungarian). Phonetic Law: Additional details of phonetic substitution of Slavic nasal vowels in Pannonian Slavic, cf. 2.75. |
| 2.206. Areal groupings (Sprachbünde) within and across the borders of the Uralic language family: A survey - In: NyK 100. Budapest 2003. 156-167. Handouts |
Data Collection: A list of Sprachbünde in which Uralic languages participate(d). Relationships between areal factors and genetic classification of Uralic languages. = 2.215 (with smaller differences). |
| 2.207. Nganasan Shamanistic Tradition: Observations and Hypotheses - In: Rediscovery of Shamanic Heritage // Ed. by M. Hoppál & G. Kosa, Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó, 2003. 195-210. |
= 2.221. |
| 2.208. Die Sprache(n) der Awaren: Die mandschu-tungusische Alternative - In: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Manchu-Tungus Studies (Bonn, August 28 - September 1, 2000). Vol. 2: Trends in Tungusic and Siberian Linguistics // Ed. by C. Näher. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz 2004 (Tunguso-Sibirica 9). 59-72. Handouts |
Partly revised German translation of 2.175. |
| 2.209. Missing link found: Matorica nova aus dem wissenschaftlichen Nachlass der Grossen Sibirischen Expedition - In: Mikola-konferencia 2002. Szeged: SzTE Finnugor Tanszék 2004. 59-74. Handouts |
Unknown Early Sources: Data from a vocabuary compiled by J. G. Gmelin (cf. 2.21) - an important additional Mator linguistic source, cf. 1.10. |
| 2.210. An outline history of the Samoyed people. - In: The Finno-Ugric World / Editor-in-Chief György Nanovfszky. Budapest: Teleki László Foundation 2004. 119-133. |
English translation of 1.9. |
| 2.211. The Nganasan language. - In: The Finno-Ugric World / Editor-in-Chief György Nanovfszky. Budapest: Teleki László Foundation 2004. 267-269. Authors: Helimski E., Nagy Imre Cs. |
English translation of 2.182. |
| 2.212. The Selkup language. - In: The Finno-Ugric World / Editor-in-Chief György Nanovfszky. Budapest: Teleki László Foundation 2004. 271-272. Authors: Helimski E., Nagy Imre Cs. |
English translation of 2.183. |
| 2.213. Исторические предпосылки языковых союзов с участием уральских языков - In: Формирование, историческое взаимодействие и культурные связи финно-угорских народов. Материалы III Международного исторического конгресса финно-угроведов. Йошкар-Ола: МарНИИЯЛИ, 2004. 53-60. Handouts |
S. 2.206, 2.215. |
| 2.214. Финно-угорские и самодийские народы. - In: Мифы и религии мира: Учебное пособие. Москва: РГГУ, 2004. 245-256. |
= 2.172. |
| 2.215. Uralic languages in Sprachbünde: Areal connections within and across the family borders - In: Les langues ouraliennes aujourd'hui: Approche linguistique et cognitive / The Uralic languages today: A linguistic and cognitive approach // M. M. Jocelyne Fernandez-West (dir.). Paris: Librairie Honoré Champion, 2005. 87-99. |
= 2.206 (with minor differences). |
| 2.216. Этнонимия уральских и сибирских народов в рукописном наследии Второй Камчатской экспедиции - In: Г. Ф. Миллер и изучениe уральских народов (материалы круглого стола) (HSFM = Hamburger Finnisch-ugrische und Sibirische Materialien = Habent Sua Fata Manuscripta, Bd. 3) // Hrsg. von Eugen Helimski. Hamburg, 2005. 19-40. Handouts |
Unknown Early Sources, Data Collection. |
| 2.217. Schö́selgub у Г. Ф. Миллера и самоназвание селькупов - In: Г. Ф. Миллер и изучениe уральских народов (материалы круглого стола) (HSFM = Hamburger Finnisch-ugrische und Sibirische Materialien = Habent Sua Fata Manuscripta, Bd. 3) // Hrsg. von Eugen Helimski. Hamburg, 2005. 41-46. |
Etymology (Selkup). |
| 2.218. Селькупский язык - In: Языки Российской Федерации и соседних государств: Энциклопедия. Т. III. Москва: Наука, 2005. 18-28. |
Description. |
| 2.218a. Финно-угорские языки - In: Языки Российской Федерации и соседних государств: Энциклопедия. Т. III. Москва: Наука, 2005. 262-268. |
Description. |
| 2.219. Уральские языки - In: Языки Российской Федерации и соседних государств: Энциклопедия. Т. III. Москва: Наука, 2005. 252-258. |
Description. |
| 2.219a. Selkup lengthening as a sound law - In: Congressus Decimus Internationalis Fenno-Ugristarum. Pars II. Linguistica. Joshkar-Ola, 2005. 195. Handouts |
An abstract of 2.232. |
| 2.220. Наследие северо-западной группы финно-угорских языков в субстратной топонимии и лексике: Реконструкции, историческая фонетика, этимология - In: Ономастика в кругу гуманитарных наук: Материалы международной научной конференции. Екатеринбург, 20-23 сентября 2005 г. Екатеринбург: Изд-во Уральского университета, 2005. 71-74. Handouts |
Short version of 2.227. |
| 2.221. Nganasan shamanistic tradition: Observations and hypotheses - In: Shamanhood: An endangered language / Ed. by J. Pentikäinen and P. Simoncsics. Oslo: Novus forlag, 2005. 85-98. |
= 2.207. |
| 2.222. The 13th Proto-Samoyedic vowel - In: Mikola-konferencia 2004. Szeged: SzTE Department of Finnougristics, 2005. 27-39. Handouts |
Amendments to Reconstruction: Nganasan distinguishes between the reflexes of PUr. *i and PUr. *e, which have been formerly believed to have coincided in Sam. *i. This amendmend leads to further reinterpretations in the system of reconstructed PSam. vowels (see a summary by A. Aikio in FUF 59: 9-11). |
| 2.223. The „Northwestern“ group of Finno-Ugric languages and its heritage in the place names and substratum vocabulary of the Russian North - In: The Slavicization of the Russian North / Ed. by J. Nuorluoto (Slavica Helsingiensia 27). Helsinki, 2006. 109-127. Handouts |
Hypothesis: The Finno-Ugric substratum languages of the Russian North - “Lop’”, “Toima”, Merya, possibly also Tver’ - form, together with Finnic and Saamic, the Northwestern group of Finno-Ugric languages. Its dissolution must have started ca. 3,000 years ago in the Upper Volga area. Conclusion: The sources of substratum toponyms and vocabulary of the Russain North were phonetically and lexically closer to Proto- Northwestern (and, if enough archaic, even to Finno-Ugric) forms than to Finnic and Saamic forms. Etymology (Onomastic). Etymology: River names in -ньга reflect Northwestern “*-n juka”-constructions. Partly revised English translation of 2.227. |
| 2.224. Краткий обзор данных по этнонимии сибирских и уральских народов в рукописном наследии Второй Камчатской экспедиции - В кн.: Три столетия академических исследований Югры: От Миллера до Штейница. Ч. 1. Академические исследования Северо-Западной Сибири в XVIII в.: История организации и научное наследие. Екатеринбург, 2006. 197-209. |
A short version of 2.216. |
| 2.225. Paul Johansen als Etymologe - In: Nordeuropa als Geschichtsregion. Beiträgedes III. Internationalen Symposiums zur deutschen Kultur unf Geschichte im europäischen Nordosten vom 20.-22. September 2001 in Tallinn (Estland) / Hrsg. von J. Hackmann und R. Schweitzer. Helsinki - Lübeck, 2006. 72-84. Handouts |
S. 2.198. |
2.226. Фонетика и (морфо)фонология энецкого языка в условиях языкового сдвига |
Description: Phonetic comparison of Forest Enets records made during the 20th century. Conclusion: Unusually radical and rapid change in Forest Enets phonetics between 1930s and 1960s consisted in replacing the forms belonging to full style of pronunciation by the forms which existed also before, but belonged to its reduced (allegro) style; this replacement affected the phonological and morphophonological levels as well. This abnormal replacement was made possible by the language shift and the interruption in the traditions of language use. |
| 2.227. Наследие северо-западной группы финно-угорских языков в субстратной топонимии и лексике: Реконструкции, историческая фонетика, этимология - In: Вопросы ономастики 3. Екатеринбург, 2006, 38-51. |
S. 2.223. |
| (2.228.) S-Singulatives in Ket. IN PRINT (Sergei Staristin In Memoriam, ed. by V. Shevoroshkin, Ann Arbor). |
Conclusion: The opposition general : singulative, independent of the opposition Pl: Sg (though these two oppositions are often insufficiently distinguished), can be etymologically traced in a number of nominal paradigms of the Ket language. |
| (2.229.) Аист и его возможные этимологические свойственники (клёст, глист) Москва. IN PRINT (Cб. памяти Топорова, ИСБ, Москва). |
Etymology (Russian, Slavic). |
| (2.230.) József Györke, Toivo Lehtisalo und einige Fragen der samojedischen etymologischen Derivationslehre Pécs. IN PRINT (Conference Proceedings, ed. by Fancsaly, Dobó / Pécs) |
Polemics, Conсlusion: Despite their significance for the Uralic studies, the monogtaphs by both Györke and Lehtisalo demonstrate the same essentially misleading approach to the historical study of derivation. |
| (2.231.) Proto-Turkic / Early Turkic in its phonetic evolution and its contacts, 1st millenium A.D. IN PRINT (Conference Proceedings, ed. by Claus Schönig / Istanbul). |
Conclusion: On a line with Turkic, and even more than Turkic, Manchu Tungus served as the source of the earliest mutual cultural borrowings within Altaic (cf. 1.18). Conclusion: It is wrong to identify all such early Turkic idioms which show r in place of Common Turkic z as Bulgar (cf. 2.104). Conclusion: Accordingly, it is wrong to qualify all early Turkic loans in Hungarian as Bulgarisms and to expect their special affinity to the forms attested in Chuvash. |
| 2.232 Продление гласных перед шва в селькупском языке как фонетический закон - LU, XLIII, No. 2, 124-133. |
Phonetic Law: Samoyed high- and medium-rise vowels are lengthened in Selkup, if the next syllable contained a Schwa vowel (with additional details). |
| 2.233. A Mezen’ Nenets glossary and other linguistic data from Sjögrén’s papers - LU, XLIII, No. 3, 197-210. |
Unknown Early Source: Western Tundra Nenets glossary compiled by Sjögren. |
| (2.234.) Apophonies in Uralic languages and their sources IN PRINT ? (Lubotsky / Leiden). |
Conclusion: Apophonic phenomena in Uralic languages are almost exceptionless historically determined by the influences of the vowels of the non-first syllables. |
| (2.235.) Случаи и источники апофонии в уральских языках. IN PREPARATION Handouts |
|
| (2.236) Ladoga and Perm revisited IN PRINT (SEC / Stachowski) |
Etymology. |
| (2.237.) Arsch als uralische Erbe IN PRINT (SEC /Stachowski) |
Etymology. |
| (2.238.) Mator and Northern Samoyed. IN PREPARATION Handouts (Materials to a paper read on May 16, 1997 for the Finno-Ugric Society, Helsinki). |
Conclusion: Before the desintegration of the Samoyed linguistic community, (Proto-)Mator belonged to the same dialectal unit as (Proto-)Nenets-Enets. The original ties are reflected in phonetics (e.g. the palatal articulation of PSam *a (Janhunen’s *ä), grammar, and especially in vocabulary. |
| 3. Энциклопедические статьи |
| 3.1-19. Лингвистические журналы. Нганасанский язык. Нанайский язык. Нилосахарские языки. Нубийский язык. Нуэр. Отомимиштекосапотекские языки. Передвижение согласных. Порода. Послелог. Редукция. Реконструкция. Самодийские языки. Селькупский язык. Финно-угорские языки. Финноугроведение. Эвенкийский язык. Эвенский язык. Энецкий язык. - In: Большая Советская Энциклопедия, тт. 14-30, Москва 1973-1978. |
| 3.43-49. Nanaju valoda. Nganasanu valoda. Nivhu valoda. N|encu valoda. Paleoaziātu valodas. Samodiešu valodas. Selkupu valoda. - In: Latvijas padomju enciklopēdija. 7-8. sējums. Rīgā, 1986. |
| 3.20-42. Ича. Корс-Торум. Кызы. Лозы. Лунг. Минлей. Мир-Суснэ-Хум. Мось. Моу-нямы. Мых-ими. Най-Эква. Нга. Нгылека. Нум. Нуми-Торум. Пор. Пугос. Пупыг. Сихиртя. Тадебцо. Тодоте. Хотал-Эква. Этпос-Ойка. - In: Мифы народов мира: Энциклопедия. Т. 1-2. Москва 1980-1982. |
| 3.50-72. Etposz-ojka. Hotal-ekva. Kors-Torum. Lung. Mih-imi. Mir-szuszne-hum. Mosz. Naj-ekva. Numi-Torum. Por. Pugosz. Pupig. Icsa. Kizi. Lózi. Minlej. Mou-njami. Nga. Ngüleka. Num. Szihirtják. Tadjebcjo. Todote. - In: Mitológiai enciklopédia. I-II. köt. Budapest 1988. |
| 3.73-100. Ди'а. Дяйку. Ича. Калташ-Эква. Корс-Торум. Кызы. Лозы. Лунг. Минлей. Мир-Суснэ-Хум. Мось. Моу-нямы. Мых-ими. Най-Эква. Нга. Нгылека. Нум. Нуми-Торум. Пор. Пугос. Пупыг. Сихиртя. Тадебцо. Тодоте. Урэр. Хотал-Эква. Шаркань. Этпос-Ойка. - In: Мифологический словарь. Москва, 1990. |
| 3.101-113. Журналы лингвистические. Нганасанский язык. Ненецкий язык. Самодийские языки. Селькупский язык. Сетяля теория. Тунгусо-маньчжурские языки. Финно-угорское общество. Финноугроведение. Эвенкийский язык. Эвенский язык. Энецкий язык. Юкагирский язык. - In: Лингвистический энциклопедический словарь. Москва, 1990. |
| 3.114-122. Бесермян язык. Кетский язык. Мансийский язык. Нганасанский язык. Ненецкий язык. Саамский язык. Селькупский язык. Хантыйский язык. Энецкий язык. - In: Красная книга языков народов России: Энциклопедический словарь-справочник. Москва, 1994. Соавторы: О. Ю. Казакевич [Кетский язык], Д. С. Болина [Энецкий язык]. |
| 3.123-126. Нганасанский язык. Ненецкий язык. Селькупский язык. Энецкий язык. - In: Енисейский энциклопедический словарь. Красноярск, 1998. |
| 3.127-139. Журналы лингвистические. Нганасанский язык. Ненецкий язык. Самодийские языки. Селькупский язык. Сетяля теория. Тунгусо-маньчжурские языки. Финно-угорское общество. Финноугроведение. Эвенкийский язык. Эвенский язык. Энецкий язык. Юкагирский язык. - In: Языкознание: Большой энциклопедический словарь. Москва, 1998 (2-е изд. книги: Лингвистический энциклопедический словарь. Москва, 1990). |
| 3.140-142. Nganaszan. Szamojéd nyelvek. Szelkup. - In: A világ nyelvei // Föszerk. Fodor István. Budapest, 1999. Szerzök: Helimszkij J., Nagy Imre Cs. |
| 3.143-151. Бесермян язык. Кетский язык. Мансийский язык. Нганасанский язык. Ненецкий язык. Саамский язык. Селькупский язык. Хантыйский язык. Энецкий язык. - In: Языки народов России: Красная книга. Энциклопедический словарь-справочник. Москва, 2002. Соавторы: О. Ю. Казакевич [Кетский язык], Д. С. Болина [Энецкий язык]. |
| 3.152. Феэнкер, Вольфганг - В кн.: Энциклопедия Югры |
| (3.153.) Hajdú, Péter |
| 4. Рецензии, сообщения | |
| 4.1. Рец.: P. Hajdú, Samojedologische Schriften - In: СФУ XIII, 1977, № 4, 301-305. |
Etymology (Samoyed). |
| 4.2.Конференция по вопросам ностратического языкознания. - In: ССл, 1977, № 6, 121-125. |
|
| 4.3. Новый славистический журнал в США. - In: ССл, 1980, № 5, 107-109. |
|
| 4.4. Рец.: R. de Bray, Handbook of Slavic Languages, vol. 1-3. - In: MАИРСК. Информационный бюллетень, вып. 5. Москва, 1981, 34-37. |
|
| 4.5. Рец.: М. Katzschmann - J. Pusztay, Jenissej-Samojedisches (Enzisches) Wörterverzeichnis. - In: СФУ XVIII, 1982, № 2, 135-147. |
Data Collection: Corrrctions, partly supplied with comments on Enets derivation and semasiology. |
| 4.6. Лингвистические публикации издательства „Славика“ (США) - In: ССл, 1982, № 6, 82-90. |
|
| 4.7. Rez.: L. Honti, Geschichte des obugrischen Vokalismus der ersten Silbe - In: СФУ XXI, 1985, № 1, 63-76. |
Polemics, Conclusion: Inacceptability of systematic appeal to „sporadic“ phonetic changes. Polemics, Reconstructive Description: The reinterpreted system of Proto-Ostyak vowels. Amendments to Reconstruction, e. g. *-w- and *-γ- in Ob-Ugric. Phonetic Laws, e.g. Wog. *ää : Ostj. *ä : Hung. e : Ural. *ä vs. Wog. *ä : Ostj. *ä : Hung. ё : Ural. *i/*ü. |
| 4.8. Рец.: Symposium saeculare Societatis Fenno-Ugricae (MSFOu 185) - In: СФУ XXI, 1985, № 4, 289-294. |
Polemics, i.a. on various issues of Indo-Uralic and Ural-Alraic problems (Nostratic relationships vs. early borrowings, localisation of contacts, etc.). Etymology (sam. < Tocharian). |
| 4.9. Книга Р. Л. Ленчека о структуре и истории словенского языка. - In: МАИРСК. Информационный бюллетень, вып. 12. Москва, 1985, 61-64. |
|
| 4.10. Рец.: I. A. Kortt - Ju. B. Simčenko, Wörterverzeichnis der Nganasanischen Sprache. Teil 1: Nganasan-Deutsch-Russisches Glossar. - In: СФУ XXII, 1986, № 4, 312-315. |
|
| 4.11. VI Международный конгресс финно-угроведов. - In: Вестник АН СССР. Москва, 1986, № 2, 123-130. |
|
| 4.12. Библиография исторической болгаристики за пределами Болгарии. - In: Зарубежная историография славяноведения и балканистики. Москва, 1986, 315-317. |
|
| 4.13. Новый славистический журнал в Финляндии. - In: ССл, 1986, № 2, 119-121. |
|
| 4.14. Рец.: H. Birnbaum - P. T. Merrill, Recent Advances in the Reconstruction of Proto-Slavic (1971-1982). - In: ССл, 1987, № 6, 120. |
|
| 4.15. Rev.: J. Janhunen, Glottal Stop in Nenets (MSFOu 196) - In: СФУ XXIII, 1987, № 4, 304-310. |
Conclusion: Any word-final glottal stop is originally an added gottal stop. |
| 4.16. XXIX сессия Постоянной Международной Алтаистической Конференции. - In: Вестник АН СССР. Москва, 1987, № 5, 72-78. Авторы: Д. Д. Васильев, Е. А. Хелимский. |
|
| 4.17. The game and its rules. - In: FUF XLVIII, 1988, H. 2-3, 393. |
Etymology (Nganasan, Tungus). |
| 4.18. Рец.: А. А. Ким, Выражение категории притяжательности в диалектах селькупского языка. - In: СФУ XXIV, 1988, № 3, 224-227. |
|
| 4.19. Рец.: K. Rédei, Uralisches Etymologisches Wörterbuch, Lfg. 1 - In: Этимология 1986-1987. Москва, 1989, 240-245. |
Etymology (Uralic). |
| 4.20. Рец.: N. S. Trubetzkoy, Operа slavica minora linguistica. - In: ССл, 1989, № 6, 110-112. |
|
| 4.21. Рец.: А. И. Гашилов, Адъективные формы существительных в тазовском диалекте селькупского языка. - In: СФУ XXV, 1989, № 1, 75-78. |
|
| 4.22. Рец.: Н. Г. Кузнецова, Глагольная подсистема кетского диалекта селькупского языка. - In: Fenno-Ugristica 16. Tartu, 1990, 197-202. |
|
| 4.23. Рец.: Сравнительно-историческое изучение языков разных семей: Теория лингвистической реконструкции - In: ВЯ, 1990, № 4, 138-145. |
Polemics, mainly on general issues of theory and methods of comparative and historical linguistics (internal reconstruction, semantic reconsruction, etc.). |
| 4.24. Rev.: G. Doerfer, Grundwort und Sprachmischung: Eine Untersuchung an Hand von Körperteilbezeichnungen - In: Word 43, 1991, No. 2, 322-330. |
|
| 4.25. Рец.: И. А. Ильяшенко, Местоименные слова в южных диалектах селькупского языка. - In: LU XXVII, 1991, № 2, 121-124. |
|
| 4.26. Рец.: А. В. Лушникова, Стратификация индо-уральских языковых контактов - In: LU XXVII, 1991, № 3, 218-222. |
Hypothesis: Original formulaion of the “Andronovo Aryan” hypothesis, s. 2.155. |
| 4.27. Congressus Septimus Internationalis Fenno-Ugristarum. - In: LU XXVII, 1991, № 2, 128-130. |
|
| 4.28. Рец.: S. Lallukka, The East Finnic Minorities in the Soviet Union. - In: Этнографическое обозрение, 1992, № 4, 162-167. |
|
| 4.29. Рец.: W. Steinitz, Ostjakologische Arbeiten, Bd. I-IV - In: ВЯ, 1992, № 2, 151-157. |
Polemics - i.a., against the “phonological extremism” and Steinitz’ reconstructions of vocalism. |
| 4.30. Рец.: В. В. Напольских, Древнейшие этапы происхождения народов уральской языковой семьи: Прауральский космогонический миф - In: Этнографическое обозрение, 1992, № 3, 153-154. |
|
| 4.31. Rev.: Ph. Baldi (ed.), Linguistic Change and Reconstruction Methodology. - In: Word 44, 1993, No. 1, 140-150. |
|
| 4.32. Rev.: Studies in the Historical Phonology of Asian Languages. - In: Diachronica X, 1993, No. 1, 111-118. |
|
| 4.33. Рец.: В. К. Кельмаков, Формирование и развитие фонетики удмуртских диалектов - In: LU XXX, 1994, № 1, 66-69. |
Conclusion: Derivation with subsequent strong reduction of the derivative suffixes (as in Permic) can create a wrong picture of “stem alternation”. |
| 4.34. Рец.: K. H. Menges, Drei Schamanengesänge der Ewenki-Tungusen Nord-Siberiens - In: ВЯ, 1995, № 4, 139-141. |
|
| 4.35. Etymologien aus dem 18. Jahrhundert ([Rez.:] J. E. Fischer, Vocabularium Sibiricum (1747): Der etymologisch-vergleichende Anteil. Bearbeitet und herausgegeben von J. Gulya (Opuscula Fenno-Ugrica Gottingensia, Bd. VII)) - In: FUF 54: 1-2, 1997, 185-192. |
Unknown Early Sources (Fisher’s amateureurish etymologizing - as an additional proof of his dependence from Mueller in his, to a great extent adequate, Uralic etymological research). |
| 4.36. Hartmut Katz 1943-1996 - In: FUF 54: 3, 1997, 391-395. |
|
| 4.37. Nenets songs: Melody comes second ([Rev.:] J. Niemi, The Nenets Songs: A structural Analysis of Text and Melody) - In: FUF 55, 1999. |
Conclusion: Melody is a secondary means of diversifying the primary hexasyllabic structure of a song text, see 2.80. |
| 4.38. Rev.: R. A. Miller, Languages and History: Japanese, Korean, and Altaic - In: Orientalistische Literaturzeitung 93/3, 1998, 389-394. |
Polemics against the “wishful thinking” characteristic of some proponents of the Altaic theory; the explanatory force of the latter are limited. Amencments to Reconstruction, Phonetic Laws: The reconstruction of two Altaic accent types is problematic; merger of all Altaic liquids in Proto-Korean, interpretation of Korean shih. |
| (4.39.) Tundra Nenets Morphology: The High Price of Exhaustiveness ([Rev.]: T. Salminen, Tundra Nenets Inflection; T. Salminen, A Morphological Dictionary of Tundra Nenets; T. Salminen, Nenets) - In: FUF (im Druck). |
|
| 4.40. Современные зарубежные лингвисты: Биобиблиографический справочник. Ч. 1-3. Москва 1981-1989. (Автор ряда статей.) |
|
| 4.41. Geleitwort - In: Diachronie in der synchronen Sprachbeschreibung: Materialien zum Internationalen Uralistischen Symposium: Hamburg, 6.-10. Oktober 1999 // Hrsg. von E. Helimski (MSUA 21). Hamburg, 1999, 3-4. Verf.: T. Fazekas, E. Helimski. |
|
| 4.42. Diachronie in der synchronen Sprachbeschreibung: Zum Thema des Symposiums - In: Diachronie in der synchronen Sprachbeschreibung: Materialien zum Internationalen Uralistischen Symposium: Hamburg, 6.-10. Oktober 1999 // Hrsg. von E. Helimski (MSUA 21). Hamburg, 1999. |
Polemics against the (pseudo-)Saussurean separation of synchrony from diachrony which leaves the historical perspective aside. |
| 4.43. „Этническая рознь“ на Таймырском Севере (кто ищет, тот всегда найдет...). [Рец. на кн.:] Д. Дж. Андерсон. Тундровики: Экология и самосознание таймырских эвенков и долган - In: Этнографическое обозрение, № 5. Москва, 2001, 173-180. |
Polemics against the “socioanthropologic” replacement of traditional ethnologic research which leaves the historical perspective aside. Ethics of field studies. |
| 4.44. Comments to the plenary presentation „Reconstructing Pre-Proto-Uralic typology spanning the millenia of linguistic evolution“ by Juha Janhunen - In: Congressus Nonus Internationalis Fenno-Ugristarum. 7.-13. 8. 2000 Tartu. Pars VI: Dissertationes sectionum: Linguistica III. Red. Tõnu Seilenthal. Tartu 2001. 445-447. |
|
| 4.45. Vorwort - In: Reden und Vorträge auf der Festveranstaltung am 14. Dezember 2001 aus Anlaß des 100. Geburtstages von Prof. Fr. Paul Johansen (23. 12. 1901 - 19. 04. 1965). Hamburg 2002. 3. Verf.: B.-U. Hergemöller, E. Helimski. |
|
| 4.46. Zum Geleit. - In: Wŭśa wŭśa - Sei gegrüßt!: Beiträge zur Finnougristik zu Ehren von Gert Sauer dargebracht zu seinem siebzigsten Geburtstag. Hrsg. von E. Helimski und A. Widmer. (VdSUA 57). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 2002. XI-XII. Verf.: E. Helimski, A. Widmer |
|
| 4.47 . Laudatio auf István Futaky vor der Mitgliederversammlung der Societas Uralo-Altaica am 24. November 2000 - In: FUM 24/25, Hamburg, 2002, 17-19. |
|
| 4.48. Kurzrezensionen (Gábor Bereczki: A magyar nyelv finnugor alapjai; Л. А. Лар: Шаманы и боги; А. М. Малолетко: Древние народы Сибири; Г. Ф. Миллер: История Сибири; M. Sarmela: Finnische Volksüberlieferung; Сибирь в панораме тысячелетий; А. Л. Шилов: Чудские мотивы в древнерусской топонимии; А. Л. Шилов: Заметки по исторической топонимике Русского Севера; Н. Л. Жуковская, Н. Ф. Мокшин: От Карелии до Урала) In: FUM 24/25, Hamburg, 2002, 251-260. |
|
| 4.49. Научное наследие Тани Ждановой: Материалы и исследования по нганасанскому языку - In: Языки мира. Типология. Уралистика: Памяти Т. Ждановой: Статьи и воспоминания. Москва: Индрик, 2002. 7-12. |
|
| 4.50. [О Тане.] - In: Языки мира. Типология. Уралистика: Памяти Т. Ждановой: Статьи и воспоминания. Москва: Индрик, 2002. 637640. |
|
| 4.51. To Péter Hajdú (2.7.1923 – 19.09.2002) - In: NyK 100. Budapest 2003. 20-21. |
|
| 4.52. Mitteilung der Redaktion. - In: FUM 26/27. Hamburg 2004. III-IV. Verf.: C. Hasselblatt, E. Helimski, A. Widmer. |
|
| 4.53. Zum Schwärmen: Eine Replik zu Michael Geisler - In: FUM 26/27. Hamburg 2004. 165-166. |
|
| 4.54. Rez.: G. Klumpp, Konverbkonstruktionen im Kamassischen - In: FUM 26/27. Hamburg 2004. 167-190. |
New Descriptive Treatment. Etymology (grammatical markers), e.g. that of the present marker -Lja-. |
| 4.55. Verzeichnis der Hochschulschriften zur Finnougristik in Deutschland 1997-2004 (mit Ergänzungen 1995-1996) - In: FUM 26/27. Hamburg 2004. 231-248. |
|
| 4.56. Vorwort - In: Mari und Mordwinen im heutigen Rußland: Sprache, Kultur, Identität. Hrsg. von E. Helimski, U. Kahrs und M. Schötschel (VdSUA 66). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 2005. IX-XXI. Verf.: E. Helimski, U. Kahrs, M. Schötschel. |
|
| (4.57.) Rez.: Michael Geisler: Vokal-Null-Alternation, Synkope und Akzent in den permischen Sprachen (VdSUA 68) Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 2005. 320 S. - FUM. IN PRINT. |
Polemics, esp. against the over-differentiation between syncope processes in Proto-Permic, Udmurt, and Komi. |
| (4.58.) Rez.: Lihkkun lehkos! Beiträge zur Finnougristik aus Anlaß des sechzigsten Geburtstages von Hans-Hermann Bartens. Hrsg. von Cornelius Hasselblatt, Eino Koponen und Anna Widmer. (VDSUA, Bd. 65.) Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz 2005. XXXIII + 492 S. - FUM. IN PRINT. |
|
| (4.59.) Рец.: Michael Geisler: Vokal-Null-Alternation, Synkope und Akzent in den permischen Sprachen (VdSUA 68). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 2005. 320 S. - Linguistica Uralica. IN PREPARATION. |
|
| (4.60.) Отзыв официального оппонента о диссертации М.А. Живлова «Реконструкция праобско-угорского вокализма» (Москва: РГГУ, 2006; 198 стр.) |
|
| (4.61.) Rez.: Anna Widmer: Studien zu Sprache und Ethnokultur der ugrischen Völker. Wissenschaftliche Abhandlung zum Vollzug der Habilitation | |
| 7. Учебные программы |
| 7.1. Введение в компаративистику: Программа курса // Российский государственный гуманитарный университет. Москва, 1996, 6 стр. |